Sublingual allergen immunotherapy with a liquid birch pollen product in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma.

BACKGROUND: Sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SLIT) has been demonstrated to be both clinically efficacious and safe. However, in line with the current regulatory guidance from the European Medicines Agency, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) products must demonstrate their efficacy and safety in pivotal phase III trials for registration. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of sublingual high-dose liquid birch pollen extract (40,000 allergy units native [AUN]/mL) in adults with birch pollen allergy. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group multicenter trial was conducted in 406 adult patients with moderate-to-severe birch pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with or without mild-to-moderate controlled asthma. Treatment was started 3 to 6 months before the birch pollen season and continued during the season in 40 clinical study centers in 5 European countries. For primary end point assessment, the recommended combined symptom and medication score of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology was used. Secondary end points included quality-of-life assessments, immunologic parameters, and safety. RESULTS: Primary efficacy results demonstrated a significant (P < .0001) and clinically relevant (32%) reduction in the combined symptom and medication score compared with placebo after 3 to 6 months of SLIT. Significantly better rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life scores (P < .0001) and the patient's own overall assessment of his or her health status, including the visual analog scale score (Euro Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale; P = .0025), were also demonstrated. In total, a good safety profile of SLIT was observed. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed both the clinical efficacy and safety of a sublingual liquid birch pollen extract in adults with birch pollen allergy in a pivotal phase III trial (EudraCT: 2013-005550-30; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02231307).

Open-label parallel dose tolerability study of three subcutaneous immunotherapy regimens in house dust mite allergic patients.

BACKGROUND: The current maintenance dose (10,000 AUeq/monthly) of a subcutaneous allergoid for house dust mite (HDM) immunotherapy has previously shown significant clinical efficacy in patients with HDM induced allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis. In order to comply with the 2009 EMA guidelines on immunotherapy products, a study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability and short-term treatment effects of up-dosing regimens with high doses (up to 40,000 AUeq) of allergoid HDM immunotherapy. METHODS: In total 48 patients with HDM-allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis (29 M/19 F; 18-53 years) were included and enrolled into one of three up-dosing regimens (1:4:4): 1) a regular regimen with up-dosing to 40,000 AUeq followed by two maintenance doses (total duration 17 weeks), 2) an intermediate regimen (14 weeks) or 3) a fast regimen (11 weeks). Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring of early and late local reactions and systemic reactions. In addition, short-term effects were assessed by conjunctival provocation test (CPT) and levels of serum allergen-specific IgE, IgG and IgG4. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients completed the study according to protocol. No early local reactions occurred. Late local reactions (LLR) were observed in 12% of the injections. In total, 31 systemic reactions, all grade 1, were reported of which two needed oral antihistamine treatment. No grade 2 or higher systemic reactions were observed. Six patients (15%) did not reach the highest dose due to LLR and/or systemic reactions needing antihistamines (20% in the regular regimen, 16% in the intermediate regimen and 13% in the fast regimen). At the end of the study, an improvement in the CPT was observed in 82.1% of patients, indirectly indicating an early treatment effect at the current dose and higher doses. In addition, IgG4 immunoglobulin levels were significantly increased in all groups following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this open-label study, allergoid HDM immunotherapy in doses up to 40,000 AUeq was generally well tolerated and no clinically relevant safety issues were identified. In the safety aspects of the three up-dosing regimens no clinically relevant differences were encountered. Therefore, these dose ranges and up-dosing regimens can be safely included in future dose-finding efficacy studies.

Sputum induction with hypertonic saline reduces fractional exhaled nitric oxide in chronic smokers and non-smokers.

BACKGROUND: Nitric oxide (NO) measurements in exhaled air and hypertonic saline-induced sputum are commonly used biomarker sampling methods of the lower airways. Both sampling methods have been validated in asthmatic patients and healthy controls, however, data from chronic smokers are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reproducibility and differences in fractional exhaled NO (FeNO) values in asymptomatic chronic smokers and healthy, non-smoking controls. Furthermore, to test the effect of hypertonic saline sputum induction (SI) on FeNO levels in both study groups. METHODS: 16 asymptomatic chronic smokers and 16 non-smokers participated in this study. Baseline FeNO and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) were recorded pre- and 30 min post NaCl 4.5% SI (3 x 5 min) on 2 study days (+/-2 h; 4-10 days apart). Mixed ANOVA was used to estimate the intra-subject Coefficient of Variation (CV) % over days; changes in FeNO and FEV(1) values before and after SI, were analyzed by a Student's paired t-test.The difference between smokers and non-smokers was estimated by a Student's t-test. RESULTS: On day 1, FeNO values in smokers were significantly lower than in non-smokers, 10.6 ppb, and 18.4 ppb, respectively, (42% difference, p = 0.0028, 95% CI: -59%, -19%). In both study groups, FeNO measurements were reproducible, with an intra-subject CV of 27.2% and 19.2%, for smokers and non-smokers, respectively. SI significantly decreased FeNO levels in both study groups on day 1. In smokers, there was a mean reduction in FeNO of almost 37% (p = 0.0045, 95% CI: -53%, -14%), and in non-smokers a mean decrease of almost 37% (95% CI : -53%, -14%; p = 0.0045). In both study groups SI did not affect FEV(1) (p > 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Our data extend previous findings in asthmatics and healthy controls to asymptomatic chronic smokers: 1. FeNO measurements are reproducible in both smokers and non-smokers; 2. baseline FeNO levels in chronic smokers are lower than in non-smokers and 3. sputum induction by hypertonic saline reduces FeNO levels in both study groups, without affecting lung function.

Effect of an NK1/NK2 receptor antagonist on airway responses and inflammation to allergen in asthma.

RATIONALE: The tachykinins substance P and neurokinin A (NKA) are implicated in the pathophysiology of asthma. OBJECTIVE: We tested the safety, tolerability, and pharmacologic and biological efficacy of a tachykinin NK(1)/NK(2) receptor antagonist, AVE5883, in patients with asthma in two double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover studies. METHODS: The pharmacologic efficacy of a single inhaled dose (4.8 mg) of AVE5883 was tested against inhaled NKA in 20 patients with asthma. Subsequently, we studied the biological efficacy of the pharmacologically effective dose on inhaled allergen in a multiple-dose trial (4.8 mg three times per day, 9 d) in 12 patients with asthma with dual responses to inhaled house dust mite. On Day 8, an allergen challenge was conducted, and airway response was measured by FEV(1) until 9 hours postallergen. Exhaled NO, provocative concentration of methacholine bromide causing a 20% fall in FEV(1), and induced sputum were performed on Days 1, 7, and 9. RESULTS: AVE5883 had a bad taste, and transient bronchospasm occurred in some subjects. A single inhaled dose shifted the dose response to NKA by 1.2 doubling doses. Pretreatment with multiple doses of AVE5883 enhanced the allergen-induced early and late airway responses. There were no significant differences in the allergen-induced changes in exhaled NO, provocative concentration of methacholine bromide causing a 20% fall in FEV(1), and sputum cell differentials between placebo and AVE5883. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its demonstrated pharmacologic activity against inhaled NKA, multiple doses of AVE5883 increased the allergen-induced airway responses without affecting markers of airway hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation. Our data question the prominent role of neurogenic inflammation in asthma and, consequently, the therapeutic potential of dual tachykinin antagonists.